Saturday, January 7, 2017

IS THE CORRUPT AMERICAN JUDICIARY FUELING THE HOMEGROWN ISIS TERROR?

IS THE CORRUPT AMERICAN JUDICIARY FUELING THE HOMEGROWN TERROR?

Jan. 7, 2017, San Jose, California

Are home grown ISIS like terror and violent acts in United States fueled by the corrupt American judiciary and the corrupt American legal profession? Facts appear to indicate that it is.

Individuals who as a last resort, are driven to commit violent acts, are left with no choice when all avenues of justice to resolve their disputes in accordance with the law is frustrated by the corrupt American judiciary, and the society ignores their desperate pleas for help. For e.g. CBS 60 minutes would rather spend half an hour to cover a story of “Havana Club” Cuba rum that no one cares about and which has little to do with common American public vs. expose the American Judiciary corruption, an epidemic that is ravaging this country for decades and impacting millions.

The terror problem is less of a firearms and a mental health problem and more a systemic failure of the American Judiciary and its corrupt practices that is skewed in favor of wealthy and celebrity litigants who essentially get away with murder by hiring slick and corrupt attorneys, and a system that is corrupted to the core by the legal profession.

Of course, judicial corruption is not unheard of. See Guest v. McCann, 474 F.3d 926, 929 (7th Cir.2007) (“Operation Greylord uncovered extensive corruption in the Illinois courts, including bribes being paid to multiple judges in exchange for dismissals”) http:// www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/05/AR2007060502453.html

One example of judicial and legal corruption is the misuse of California Vexatious Litigant Law, intended to curb frivolous lawsuits, but in reality is routinely misused by the California Judiciary to avoid all legitimate work while pocketing hefty taxpayer paid salaries, and to punish the whistle blowing litigant exposing judiciary’s corruption.

Currently there are over 2,000+ individuals on the State of California, vexatious litigant list. see http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/vexlit.pdf A sizable portion of these 2,000+ individuals are parents who got dragged into divorce lawsuits filed by their ex-spouses (which defies the intent of the vexatious litigant law as they did not initiate the lawsuit to begin with). These parents lack ability to hire attorneys and fall easy prey to the vague and ambiguous claws of the California State Vexatious Litigant law (California Code of Civil Procedure, §391 et seq.).

To choke and seal off your opponent, all an attorney represented wealthy litigant has to do is to make a motion to label the opponent as vexatious and it will be granted as long as the opponent is defending the lawsuit self-represented, and has filed a few motions that the defendant did not prevail on. The average life of a divorce case in U.S. is over 5 years with numerous motions per year, so the above criteria can very easily be met. Moreover, it is a catch-22 as without a motion, one cannot get an issue addressed before the court, which if and when filed by a self-represented party, becomes grounds for being banned from the American Justice system via misuse of the Vexatious Litigant law. Damn if you don’t (blamed for not seeking timely relief by a motion) and Damn if you do. This is just one of the many examples of the loopholes in the vexatious litigant law that permits the American Judiciary and wealthy attorneys to commit their nefarious acts.

Every case #, a self-represented appeal, a writ, a petition, a review before the higher court, is counted as a new case and in addition to the motion criteria, five of these case #s makes one a vexatious litigant.  Practically every self-represented defender of a lawsuit is a potential target to be labeled a vexatious litigant.

Next, once labeled vexatious the civil option of resolving issues are shut sealed See https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8cp1MkxZWRtWGVGakx2dEZTUTg/view?usp=sharing   In these filed documents, the defender (not the initiator) of the divorce lawsuit, is simply asking the California Family Court to rule on the open domestic relations issues that the very California Family Court reserved on since 2011. Clearly the request is legitimate and does not appear to be vexatious at all.  Yet the judiciary, driven by the army of California Judicial Council lawyers, in order to avoid work, and punish this litigant for exposing the judiciary’s corrupt acts, simply denies it, and locks the self-represented defending litigant out from his home, his children, his personal property, and more.

Almost 100% of pre-filing requests that individual labeled vexatious litigants, are forced to seek permission on, are summarily denied without a single word of reasoning, as seen in the example above, the latter on purpose, to keep the reader guessing as to why it is being denied vs. educating the world so that one can learn from the denial and avoid it repeating it again. This itself defies the vexatious litigant law as by concealing the reasons for the denial, it actually perpetuates, rather than reduce future court filings.

Given the importance of domestic relations issues, like access to children, and given the exclusive monopoly of state courts over this matter (Federal Courts do not have domestic relations jurisdiction), thousands of parents and children are left in limbo with their grievances unresolved, foreclosing their option to seek redress in a civil forum.

It is no wonder then that the corrupt practices of the American Justice System leaves such individuals with only one other choice, namely to settle their grievances by violent means, since media and politicians do not have the backbone to go against the American Judiciary, and ones that have tried have been told not to meddle. The common excuse is that a judge cannot discuss the facts of the case with anyone. That is simply an excuse for lack of transparency and accountability especially when cameras are not allowed in open public courtrooms.

Any attempt by the politicians to hold the American Judiciary accountable are fought tooth and nail by the American Judges. For e.g. a recent California State Attorney General’s audit of the California Judges, via audit of the California Commission on Judicial performance has resulted in the latter suing the former to block the audit, which lawsuit is before, you guessed it right, the very state judges, who are being audited, see https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8cp1MkxZWRtNkRhX2dqdVpUcUU/view?usp=sharing

Judges own created judicial immunity from lawsuits, no oversight, corrupt practices, exclusive monopoly over resolving public disputes, and that too in the hands of the corrupt legal profession, California Judicial Council authoring/engineering orders for American Judges,etc. see https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8cp1MkxZWRtN1RvREdDOGJHd3M/view?usp=sharing is leaving decent individuals with no civil avenue for just relief and is fueling the homegrown ISIS terror in U.S.

Even the President Donald Trump recognizes that the American Judicial System is rigged. The question is can politicians, media, public, and the legal profession clean this up? If not, expect the ISIS like homegrown terror to continue. 

The answer to the violence is to remove the root cause of the violence and not more laws, regulation and punishment. We still haven’t learned the lessons of humanity. Shame on us!


Please direct your comments and queries to judicialirregularities@gmail.com

1 comment:

  1. I am not sure whether or not the judiciary is fueling homegrown ISIS terror. But I am in total agreement that the judicial system is corrupt. It treats self-represented litigants as bad as blacks were treated in the South during Jim Crow. I know this from experience. I am black and I grew up in the South during the Jim Crow era. Also, I am representing myself in two lawsuits I filed against the City of San Jose for blatant civil rights violations. During the litigation of my lawsuits, I have been treated with less respect and dignity by San Jose city officials and the federal courts than by the Confederate flag waving segregationists that I encountered. I have complained to the local media, several elected officials and law enforcement entities about crimes committed by San Jose city officials and the courts. So far, nothing. But just as you state, I am left with nothing to do but take matters into my own hands. And I will. I do not plan to commit any violent acts, but everything else is on the table. It is my intent to make 2017 a year San Jose city officials and the Bay Area federal courts will not not soon forget. Here are links that provide information about my cases:https://www.facebook.com/groups/624131267713226/
    www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-san-jose-mayor-sam-licardo-and-city-council
    http://crnctz.blogspot.com/2015/08/exposing-cover-up-of-cheating-scandal.html

    ReplyDelete